Mads Gjerrild, CEO

Are you benefiting from your advisor using AI?

Or is your adviser making more money?

Are you benefiting from your advisor using AI?

Or is your advisor making more money?

Just yesterday, I had to conduct a legal review for a company. It required reviewing +50 pages and drafting a response.
It took 5 minutes through Leaf - it would have taken me several hours just to read the documents.

Me: "I need to review these 50 pages and draft a legal memo."
The AI agent: "Upload the documents - I will identify the relevant sections, summarise the essentials, and draft the memo. What will it be used for?"
Me: "An assessment of contract risks for a potential partner."
The AI agent: "Understood. Give me a moment."
5 minutes later: Finished memo.

The same would have cost the client several hours using me as a legal advisor.

Of course, the client should get the savings, and NOT the advisor.

AI is being adopted by virtually all advisors - but it is not reflected in the price for the client. Historically, efficiency gains in services have rarely led to lower prices. Only higher margins.
That changes when you own the AI product and the delivery yourself. When you can perform the same tasks as your supplier, the price is no longer set by who knows the most - but by what is actually delivered.

Next time your supplier tells you they "use AI" - ask where the saving is.

It is there. You just are not getting it.

Unless you hold the tool yourself.

Back to all insights

Back to all insights